Prediction of Samira Giger vs Emma Milicevic Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Giger vs E. Milicevic

Samira Giger

SUI

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

747

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Emma Milicevic

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

747

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Giger 1 - 0 Milicevic

They have played 2 sets in total, with Samira Giger winning 2 and Emma Milicevic winning 0. The last match between Samira Giger and Emma Milicevic was at the Antalya, 04-04-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Samira Giger getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Giger	1
Milicevic	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Antalya(04-04-16)

Stats

Samira Giger

Emma Milicevic

S. Giger vs E. Milicevic H2H Profile

S. Giger	Stats	E. Milicevic
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.00% (84-91)	Career Total W/L	31.58% (6-13)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Giger vs E. Milicevic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samira Giger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Emma Milicevic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samira Giger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emma Milicevic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Samira Giger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emma Milicevic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Samira Giger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Emma Milicevic winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Samira Giger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 22/26). Emma Milicevic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 6/8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Samira Giger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Emma Milicevic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Samira Giger winning 1 times and Emma Milicevic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Samira Giger winning 2 and Emma Milicevic winning 0.
The last match between Samira Giger and Emma Milicevic was at the Antalya, 04-04-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Samira Giger getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samira Giger has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Emma Milicevic has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samira Giger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emma Milicevic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Samira Giger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emma Milicevic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Samira Giger vs Emma Milicevic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Giger vs E. Milicevic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Giger	Stats	E. Milicevic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Giger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Savitaipale - 31-07-2017
Q1 Anna IakovlevaA. Iakovleva	L	4-6 6-1 6-1	Stats
Tampere - 24-07-2017
Q3 Gyulnara NazarovaG. Nazarova	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Nanette NylundN. Nylund	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Antalya - 04-04-2016
R1 Britt GeukensB. Geukens	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Q3 Corina MaderC. Mader	W	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

E. Milicevic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bastad - 16-05-2016
Q1 Rebecca EhnR. Ehn	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q3 Astrid Wanja Brune OlsenA. Wanja	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Antalya - 04-04-2016
Q1 Samira GigerS. Giger	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Stockholm - 02-11-2015
Q1 Cecilia EngbackC. Engback	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Bastad - 11-05-2015
R1 Malin UlvefeldtM. Ulvefeldt	L	7-5 6-1	Stats

View All

S. Giger vs E. Milicevic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Giger	Stats	E. Milicevic
48.00% (84/91)	YTD Win/Loss	31.58% (6/13)
49.08% (187/194)	Sets Win/Loss	36.59% (15/26)
50.23% (1642/1627)	Games Win/Loss	43.32% (146/191)
45.83% (22/26)	Hard Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
50.00% (59/59)	Clay Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
33.33% (3/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/3)
1	Aces Total	0
0.01	Double Faults Per Game	0
14	Total Double Faults	0
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
438.9	Average Opponent Rank	290.37
48% (46/95)	1st Serve %	0% (0/0)
52% (24/46)	1st Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
22% (11/49)	2nd Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
50% (5/10)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/0)
41% (38/93)	Return Points Win %	0% (0/0)
33.33% (4/8)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
49.08% (80/83)	Futures W/L	31.58% (6/13)
47% (81/171)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	33% (6/18)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
39% (9/23)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
36% (12/33)	Deciding Set Win %	25% (1/4)
83% (90/75)	1st Set Won, Won Match	71% (7/5)
16% (90/14)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (7/1)
9% (85/8)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (12/1)